Personal tools

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Updates by Email
Join Our List
Privacy Policy
You are here: Home What We Do Science Assessment for the Sierra Checkerboard Initiative Full metadata index VEGETATION BIODIVERSITY AND LAND COVER DATA

VEGETATION BIODIVERSITY AND LAND COVER DATA

TO OPEN A DETAILED METADATA FILE FOR A DATA
SET, IF ONE EXISTS, CLICK ON THE METADATA LINKS.

BACK TO THE FULL METADATA INDEX

2002_TM7_BAND583.IMG

(RASTER) Erdas Imagine format Landsat 7 ETM+ 30 meter resolution composite image using band 5 for red, 8 for green, and 3 for blue. The original Landsat image was taken in July of 2002 and provided in GeoTIF format by the US Geological Survey and the CalView project at: http://gis.ca.gov/ meta.epl?oid=5734. (METADATA1) (METADATA2)

BLODGET_COMP

Basic vegetation cover, management practices, and habitat information for the University of California Berkley's Blodgett Forest Research Station last updated in the 1990's by the Blodgett Forest Research Station at an unknown scale. A subset of the compartments was used to conduct a limited accuracy assessment of the SP_FORESTLAND potential productive forestland results. (METADATA1)

CA0400NLCD

(RASTER) Land cover with 22 possible land cover classes last updated in 2000 by a consortium of federal agencies at a resolution of 30 meters. The original images for California were acquired from 1987 through 1993. Data set abstract: This land cover data set was produced as part of a cooperative project between the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to produce a consistent, land cover data layer for the conterminous U.S. based on 30-meter Landsat thematic mapper (TM) data. National Land Cover Data (NLCD) was developed from TM data acquired by the Multi-resoultion Land Characterization (MRLC) Consortium. The MRLC Consortium is a partnership of federal agencies that produce or use land cover data. Partners include the USGS (National Mapping, Biological Resources, and Water Resources Divisions), USEPA, the U.S. Forest Service, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (METADATA1) (METADATA2) (METADATA3)

DIGITAL ORTHOPHOTOGRAPHS

(RASTER) Geometrically and orthographically corrected, one meter resolution, gray scale, digital photographs (DOQQ) are available for the study area. The extent of each DOQQ is one-quarter of a USGS 7.5 minute topographic quadrangle. The study area requires 604 individual DOQQs to cover the entire area with only three of the DOQQs not available. The DOQQs were taken in four different years with 96 images taken in 1993, 30 images taken in 1994, 439 images taken in 1998, and 38 images taken in 1999. The images are provided in GeoTIF and Mr. Sid formats by the California Spatial Information Library at: http://gis.ca.gov/meta.epl?oid=21015. (METADATA1) (METADATA2)

FRAP_DEVELOP

(RASTER) Development footprint derived from housing density and land cover data last updated in 2000 by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire and Resource Assessment Program at a scale of 1:100,000 and a resolution of 100 meters. Data set abstract: This data layer is an attempt to spatially define the "footprint of development", which includes both residential and commercial development. FRAP has thoroughly analyzed various data layers to determine the preferred method for capturing development, especially the difficult task of identifying commercial development. Data sources include 2000 Census block data for housing, 2000 land ownership data for identifying uninhabited public lands, 1990's USGS National Landcover Data, and 2000 Census Urbanized Area data. The data include fields related specifically to identifying the Wildland Urban Interface for fire protection applications. (METADATA1)

FRAP_VEG_CNG1

Causes of vegetation change from 1990 to 1998, version 1, last updated in 2002 by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire and Resource Assessment Program at a minimum mapping unit of 1 hectare. Data set abstract: Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite imagery is used to locate magnitudes of vegetation change within five-year time periods across all vegetation types and ownerships. The "change image", also available on-line, depicts increases and decreases in vegetative cover over 5 year periods for 4 different project areas in California. The exact dates of TM imagery are contained in a supplementary Arc/Info regions coverage (also on-line). This record relates to an ArcInfo coverage of change polygons derived from the change image, attributed by cause of vegetation change. Cause is assigned using fire perimeter data, USFS harvest/plantation data, and fieldwork. The California Land Cover Mapping & Monitoring Program (LCMMP) is a collaborative effort of the USDA Forest Service and CDF to map and assess changes in California's vegetation. This effort provides monitoring data for regional assessment across ownerships and vegetation types. We also identify the cause of changes using current fire perimeter data, USFS harvest/plantation data and fieldwork. By revisiting each project area on a five year schedule, it is possible to detect trends and conversion rates of vegetation. (METADATA1)

FRAP_VEG_V2

(RASTER) Multi-source vegetation landcover last updated in 2002 by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire and Resource Assessment Program at a resolution of 100 meters. This data set looks more spatially detailed then the SNEP or GAP vegetation data sets, but the GAP data set has many more attributes. Data set abstract: CDF-FRAP compiled the "best available" land cover data into a single data layer, to support the various analyses required for the 2002 Forest and Range Assessment. Typically the most current and detailed data were collected for various regions of the state or for unique mapping efforts (farmland, wetlands, riparian vegetation). Decision rules were developed that controlled which layers were given priority in areas of overlap. Cross-walks were used to compile the various sources into the common California Wildlife Habitat Relationships (CWHR) system classification. Data sources had unique scale/resolution, multi-source data provided as 100m GRID. The original 1/2002 data used to support the Assessment is also available from the FRAP site - this record corresponds to the most recent updated version of the data (10/2002), which incorporates better data for the Mojave & NE Colorado Desert areas. (METADATA1)

FRAPX_SITECLS

THESE ARE RESTRICTED DATA SETS WE RECEIVED FROM SHAWN SAVING AND THE DATA MUST NOT BE REDISTRIBUTED. Forest site class information last updated using 1991 through 1994 inventory data by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Fire and Resource Assessment Program at a minimum mapping unit of about 6,000 acre hexagons. Data set abstract: This coverage contains the new annual 6000 acre hexes based on spatial overlay of the 1991-1994 California inventory on off-National Forest lands only. The attributes of interest are the last three: MAXSC, MINSC and AVGSC for maximum, minimum and average site class. Because the old grid was irregular and not as intense as the new annual hex grid, some hexes have no old plots in them (about 20%), and others have more than one, hence the stats min, max and avg. Note also that site class is a condition class variable (as opposed to a plot variable), so when there is more than one condition class, some conditions (non-forest or chaparral) will have no defined site class, or are assigned site class 7, for non-timber. In these instances, the value of site class for the condition that is timber overrides all other values. Many of the plots in California are non-timber, so no site class is estimated (e.g., oak woodland, chaparral and other non-forest types). (METADATA1)

FS_CHNG85_91

(RASTER) Vegetation cover (not type) change from 1985 to 1991 last updated in 2000 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a resolution of 30 meters. Data set abstract: This grid contains vegetative cover change detection data for the Sierra Nevada Range from the mid 1980s to the mid 1990s. The deliverable is a mid-1980s to mid-1990s change layer created by employing image differencing techniques between two dates of Landsat TM imagery. Pacific Meridian Resources used date 1 TM imagery (1990-1991, UTM 10,11) and co-registered USGS 1985 TM imagery (UTM 10,11) to perform image differencing. (METADATA1)

FS_CHNG91_96

Vegetation cover (not type) change from 1991 to 1996 last updated in 2000 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a resolution of 30 meters. This version of change data has more change categories then the 1985 to 1991 version. Data set abstract: This grid contains vegetative cover change detection data for the central Sierra Nevada Range from the early 1990s to the mid 1990s. The deliverable is a early 1990s to mid-1990s change layer created by employing image differencing techniques between two dates of Landsat TM imagery. (METADATA1)

FS_CUT_PLAN

Timber sales and harvest information last updated in 2000 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a scale of 1:24,000. Data set abstract: None. (METADATA1)

FS_MEADOWAREA

Areas with meadow vegetation last updated in 1998 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a scale of 1:24,000. Data set abstract: This coverage contains polygon features of Meadow Vegetation. This data was developed by the USDA Forest Service for use in the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Statement. (METADATA1)

FS_NONFSTZONE

Forest and non-forest zones last updated in 1994 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a scale of 1:24,000 with a minimum mapping area of 0.4 ha and minimum mapping width of 35 meters. Data set abstract: The purpose of delineating the nonforest zone is to determine the area of responsibility for inventory as prescribed by the Congress of the United States of America. The objective is to provide the resource data needed to develop economically and silviculturally sound timber management plans. Nonforest is land not qualifying as forest land. Includes land that has never supported forest growth and land once forest land but now developed for nonforest use such as crops, pasture, residential areas, highways, airstrips, etc. Areas of water less than 16 hectares in size or less than 200 meters in width will also be classified as nonforest. Census water, areas of water larger than 10 percent stocking is equated with 10 percent crown cover or 10 percent of yield table values. A tree is defined as a woody plant that at maturity commonly has a total height of at least 4 meters. Ag. Handbook No.541. Minimum area is .4 ha and minimum width is 35 m. (METADATA1)

FS_OLDFOREST

Old forest emphasis areas last updated in 2001 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a scale of 1:24,000. Data set abstract: This coverage contains polygon features of Old Forest Emphasis Areas for the Preferred Alternative (Alternative 8 - Modified), Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment EIS. The final Old Forest Emphasis Areas used in the preferred alternative -Mod8 is a hybrid of Alternative 6 and 8 old forest emphasis areas. For the westside of the Sierras Alternative 8 old forest emphasis areas was used and for the eastside of the Sierras - Alternative 6 old forest emphasis areas was used. This hybrid evolved due to the old forest emphasis areas being seen as a necessary component of the California Spotted Owl strategy. The larger allocation delineated by Alternative 8 was seen as essential to that strategy and the westside of the Sierras encompassed the majority of California Spotted Owl activity centers. On the eastside of the Sierras the Alternative 6 old forest emphasis areas was sufficient. The approach used was the same for all of the alternatives with old forest. The overall objectives were to: (a) encompass areas with the greatest existing concentrations of old forest (Franklin et al. 1997) at the landscape level, and (b) delineate blocks large enough to allow for wide-scale ecosystem processes to occur (Franklin et al. 1997, Barrett and Barrett 1997, Murphy and Noon 1992). For alternatives 3 and 6, the objectives included: encompassing the best remaining landscape concentrations, provide for larger enough blocks to remain functional following a large wildfire and provide for some of the subpopulations of owls and forest carnivores. For alternatives 5, 8 and the preferred, the objectives were the same as for alternatives 3 and 6 but with the additional objective of providing sufficient area for most subpopulations of owls and forest carnivores. (METADATA1)

FS_PLANTATION

Plantation areas last updated in 1997 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a scale of 1:24,000. Data set abstract: The purpose of the plantation layer is to track forest areas that have been reforested due to past harvest or other stand replacement events such as wildfire and insect damage caused mortality. This layer is a key activity layer for updating existing vegetation maps. The mapped stands are used to identify age classes of young forests for both assigning average tree sizes for seedling and saplings in existing vegetation maps, and as age class groups for forest-wide inventory strata populations. For areas that have been planted, a date of stand origin is recorded. If the area has been deforested and not planted yet, a non-stocked is recorded. Reforestation harvests of shelterwood and overstory removals are also tracked in this layer. For each Forest, Ranger District personnel were asked to map historical plantation areas and assign origin dates.
* Scale of Capture: 1:24,000
* Coverage Name: PNTN
* Coverage Type: Polygon
* Access Constraints: none
(METADATA1)

FS_SEQUOIA

Giant Sequoia groves last updated in 2001 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a scale of 1:24,000. Data set abstract: This coverage contains polygon features of Meadow Vegetation. This data was developed by the USDA Forest Service for use in the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Statement. (METADATA1)

FS_TIMBERDATA

(RASTER) Site indices for potential tree growth, vegetative cover, timber volume, timber value, and live tree biomass last updated in 2002 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a resolution of 30 meters. Data set abstract: This grid represents an enumeration of all possible vegetation strata for National Forests in Region 5. By linking to an associated data table (R5STRA02_1G.dat), displays of timber volume, timber value, and live tree biomass are possible. For more information about this layer and using the associated data, go to http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/rsl/projects/ frdb/layers/stra.html. The Vegetation Inventory Strata map is a derived layer from two main sources, the latest Existing Vegetation map and vegetation inventories. Strata represent subpopulations of sample plots, grouped by vegetation map labels to reduce the statistical variance of estimates. The strata map provides a means of extrapolating per-acre resource values obtained from inventory plot data to an entire National Forest. (METADATA1) (METADATA2)

FS_TREE_MORT

Tree mortality, defoliation, and other damage last updated in 2003 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a scale of 1:100,000. Data set abstract: This layer consists of polygons representing conifer and hardwood damage as mapped during aerial surveys. Damage is labeled according to level of severity, pest agent or other environmental influence. Current mortality is sketch mapped by an aerial observer and is defined by red to reddish brown trees; defoliation is defined by loss of foliage. Observations are stratified by 1) percent mortality, defoliation or other damage type and 2) vegetation type as defined below. Polygons are drawn on the sketch map and labeled appropriately. (METADATA1)

FS_VEG_1934

Historical vegetation from 1934 last updated in 1998 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a scale of 1:500,000. Data set abstract: This coverage contains polygon features of Historical California Vegetation. This data was developed for use in land analysis and map making within the boundaries of Region 5. Source for data capture was a 1934 paper map drafted by the California Forest Experiment Station, Giannini Foundation, College of Agriculture, University of California. Vegetation polygons were drawn on USGS State of California map compiled in 1929 by A.F. Hassan. Scale of the source map is 1:500,000. The source map was North American datum 1929. (METADATA1)

FS_VEG_1945

Historical forest area, timber volume, & vegetation type from "1945 Wieslander California Vegetation Type" last updated in 1997 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at an unknown scale. Data set abstract: This coverage represents the old growth as of 1945. The associated publication is Forest Areas, Timber Volumes, and Vegetation Types in California, March 1, 1946, A. E. Weislander and Herbert A. Jensen, California Forest and Range Experiment Station, Stephen N. Wycoff, Director, Berkeley, CA. This coverage is a 1945 digitized hardcopy map of old growth that existed at that time. LUTs were made of codes from Growth, SPP, and Cover. These LUTs were joined into the pat. These types were taken from a hardcopy map delivered at the same time as the coverages. The source date is Jan. 1, 1945. Timber is a concatenation of the 3 mentioned codes. Cover is only on growth with a value of 4, which is poorly stocked or unstocked and has reverted to non-timber vegetation. (METADATA1)

FS_VEG_1977

Historical vegetation from 1977 last updated in 1996 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a scale of 1:250,000. Data set abstract: The source mapping was done between 1979 and 1981 by U. S. Forest Service ecologists. The mapping process involved photo-interpretation of 1:250,000 scale color infra-red prints of Landsat Multispectral Scanner (MSS) imagery acquired between 1977 and 1979. The average polygon size is 38,000 acres for the entire state (excluding polygons along map edges). Consequently, many important vegetation communities that occur in smaller units are not distinguished. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection created the digital 'VEG' coverage by scanning the source maps. (METADATA1)

FS_VEG_2000

(VECTOR and RASTER) Existing vegetation for the Eldorado and Tahoe National Forests and the Lake Tahoe Management Unit last updated in 2000 by the US Forest Service, Region 5 at a minimum mapping unit of 2.5 acres. Vegetation types, size classes, and densities are included using both USFS and CA WHR measurement systems. For more details about the CA WHR system values, please see the document contained in the METADATA4 link. Data set abstract: This coverage contains polygon features of existing vegetation. Forest extent existing vegetation coverages are derived from the coincident eveg tiles contained within the Regional data library. The mapping of existing vegetation on National Forest land is done to provide information for strategic-level planning at the National, Regional and Forest levels. Minimum mapping size is 2.5 acres for contrasting vegetation conditions based on vegetation type, tree canopy closure, and overstory tree size (see tables 38, 40, and 39). No minimum mapping unit for lakes and conifer plantations (METADATA1) (METADATA2) (METADATA3) (METADATA4)

FSTLAND_VALID

The SP_FORESTLAND data set clipped to the extent of the SP_BLOD_VALID data set. The FSTLAND_VALID data set was used for the accuracy assessment of the SP_FORESTLAND results.

GAP_VEG98

Vegetation and land cover last updated in 1998 by the Biogeography Lab, University of California, Santa Barbara, California Gap Analysis Program at a minimum mapping unit of 100 hectares (247 acres) for upland community types and 40 hectares (99 acres) for wetland communities. This data set looks less spatially detailed then Legacy Project (LP) vegetation data sets and is about 5 years older, but the GAP data set has many more attributes. Data set abstract: This layer is the land-cover/land use data compiled for the California Gap Analysis Project. It contains vegetation attributes for landscape scale map units, including canopy dominant species, canopy density, presence of regional endemic species, and inclusion of wetland habitats. Although polygons are classified into several schema (California Natural Diversity Data Base or "Holland" system, California Wildlife Habitat Relationships habitat types), data on presence of dominant canopy species are provided to allow customized classifications to meet a user's needs. (METADATA1)

KUCHLERVEG

Potential vegetation at a scale of 1:1,000,000 for California derived from a map created by Kuchler in 1976. Original data set was obtained from the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project web site (http://www.ice.ucdavis.edu/snep/dataset.asp? dataset=403) and was called “kuchler.e00.gz.” The attribute values for this data set include common and scientific vegetation cover name and the data should be useable. (METADATA1) (METADATA2) (METADATA3)

LANDSAT 7 IMAGES

(RASTER) Landsat 7 30 meter resolution images for monochromatic bands 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Low Gain, 6 High Gain, 7, and 8 as well as composite bands 321 (true color) and 547 (false color) are available. Images are available for both July of 2001 and July of 2002 and provided in GeoTIF format by the US Geological Survey and the CalView project at: http://gis.ca.gov/meta.epl?oid=5734. (METADATA1) (METADATA2)

LP_GENPLANS

Standardized land use created from county and city general plans last updated in April 2004 by the California Resources Agency Legacy Project and the University of California Davis at an unknown scale. Data set abstract: We undertook creating the first ever seamless statewide General Plan map for California. All county general plans and many city general plans were integrated into 1 statewide Geographic Information System (GIS) dataset. The data was then standardized to thirteen consistent land use classifications for the intent of natural resource and infrastructure planning. The dataset is a scenario of landuse more adequately representing current residential and rural residential growth. (METADATA1) (METADATA2) (METADATA3)

LULC_SW

Land use and land cover based on parcel boundaries at an unknown scale for the southwestern portion of the central Sierra Nevada ecoregion from the Sacramento Area Council of Governments. Original data set was obtained from the web site http://www.sacog.org. Data set abstract: This file is a compilation of land uses compiled from general, specific and community plans of all cities and counties in the region. Each jurisdiction's land use codes have been generalized into categories which could be used across the region. Data is attributed at the parcel level and includes, among other fields, Plan Name, Generalized Land Use Code and Acres. The attribute values for this data set are not explained and do not have many obvious meaning. There was no metadata for this data set.

SBI_OLDFST

Late successional old growth forest identified by the Sierra Biodiversity Institute using 1990 imagery. (METADATA1)

SNEP_LATE_SUCCESSION_OLD_GROWTH

Late successional old growth polygons last updated in 1996 by the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project. This is a database table and not a spatial data set. These attributes have been attached to the SNEP_OLDFST data set. There are a set of attributes (Patch_1, Prank_1, Pdist_1_1, Pdist_1_2, Pdist_1_3, Pdist_1_4, Per_poly_1, Tree_ac_1, Tree_dec_1, Lg_dbh_1, Int_can_1, Snag_1, Sc_low_1, Sc_high_1, Dom_spp_1, and Closure_1) that are repeated for up to seven patches for each late successional polygon. Original database was called “lsog_final.e00.gz.” Data set abstract: The attribute database that describes these layers is a stand alone ARC/INFO info file named lsog_final. It can be linked to the coverages by the join item poly_id. In some areas the intermix of private and public land was too complex for the resource experts to accurately exclude the private land in their hand drawn polygons. However, the data recorded for the polygon is only applicable to the public land. Therefore, to accurately use this layer the GIS analyst must use the administrative boundaries (i.e. the administrative boundary for the Plumas National Forest) to exclude any private land from area calculations or maps. Otherwise any acreage estimates or maps would be inaccurate because the database does not include information about private land within the polygon. (METADATA1)

SNEP_LATE_SUCCESSIONAL_EMPHASIS

Areas of late successional emphasis (ALSEs) polygon ID list last updated in 1996 by the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project. This is a database table and not a spatial data set and the values from this table have been added to the SNEP_OLDFST data set as the ALSE item. Original database was called “alse_info.e00.gz.” Data set abstract: ALSEs are made up of multiple late-successional old growth (LSOG) polygons on the western slopes of the Sierra Nevada. The is an info file of all of the LSOG polygons. This is a binary file, so for the item ALSE, 1 = ALSE and 0 = not an ALSE. The purpose of these areas is to maintain concentrations of high-quality late-successional forest function. They were identified by using existing high-ranked polygons (4s and 5s) as cores. This approach incorporates both reserves and areas managed intensively to reduce the potential for catastrophic fire. Purpose is to identify late-successional (LSOG) polygons which make up the Areas of Late Successional Emphasis (ALSEs). (METADATA1)

SNEP_OLDFST

Late successional old growth (LSOG) polygons and areas of late successional emphasis (ALSE) last updated in 1996 by the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project at a scale of 1:24,000 to 1:126,720. Data set was obtained from the Remote Sensing Lab, Region 5, USDA Forest Service. Explanations for the sub-polygon data (all of the attributes past the ALSE and RANK attributes) can be found through the METADATA2 link. Data set abstract: This coverage contains the mapping and characterization of late-successional forest attributes for the National Forests, State Parks, National Parks, and Bureau of Land Management land in the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project Study area. The data do not include information about private land. The mapping was originally done by agency resource experts with guidance from the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project Late-Successional Work Group. This coverage contains ecological attributes for landscape map units including rank based on the polygon's level of late-successional forest attributes. Each polygon is subdivided into no more than 7 subpolygons or patches. Each patch is classified as a percentage of the larger polygon and described by ecological attributes. Each patch is not geographically described on this layer. The attribute database that describes these layers is a stand alone ARC/INFO info file named lsog_final. It can be linked to the coverages by the join item poly_id. In some areas the intermix of private and public land was too complex for the resource experts to accurately exclude the private land in their hand drawn polygons. However, the data recorded for the polygon is only applicable to the public land. Therefore, to accurately use this layer the GIS analyst must use the administrative boundaries (i.e. the administrative boundary for the Plumas National Forest) to exclude any private land from area calculations or maps. Otherwise any acreage estimates or maps would be inaccurate because the database does not include information about private land within the polygon. (METADATA1) (METADATA2)

SNEP_SEQUOIA

Giant Sequoia groves last updated in 1996 by the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project at an unknown scale. Original data set was called “comgs_total.e00.gz.” Data set abstract: One of the tasks of the Mediated Settlement Agreement / Giant Sequoia (MSA/GS) Workgroup has been to compile an ARC/INFO coverage for all giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron gigantea) groves in the Sierra Nevada. Giant sequoia groves are managed by a minimum of twelve different public and private agencies. This has resulted in substantial difficulty in the compilation of the coverage and in wide variation in the methodologies employed in the mapping process. It is extremely important that the user of the database understand that the coverage is the product of splicing together hard copy and digital information on giant sequoia grove boundaries collected from a variety of sources. In addition to recognizing the different methodologies employed, it is also important to note that the mapping has been undertaken with different objectives. Some of the boundaries were intended to represent a line drawn around the outermost trees in a grove, while some included buffer zones for administrative purposes. Also, in many cases, adherence to administrative boundaries is manifested by unnaturally straight or right angle delineations of grove boundaries. Lastly, there is great dispute regarding what constitutes a giant sequoia grove or if the very concept of a grove is even useful from more than a management perspective. (METADATA1)

SNEP_TE_PLANT

Total number of rare plants by topographic quadrangle last updated in 1995 by the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project at an unknown scale. Original data set was called “shevock3.e00.gz.” Data set abstract: Rare taxa were recorded to the topographic quadrangle level based on data from Skinner and Pavlik (1994). Data collected by the California Native Plant Society after the publication in 1994 were also incorporated. This layer is a visual representation of the concentration and distribution of rare taxa ranging from one to fifteen rare plants per quadrangle. There are several areas throughout the Sierra Nevada where concentrations or ensembles of rare and endemic species are located. Quads with five or more rare plants generally represent the presence of an ensemble area. Many of these ensembles are located on unusual substrates or soils, occur in areas with high plant species diversity, or occur in uncommon habitats or vegetation types. (METADATA1)

SNEP_VEG

Detailed vegetation cover from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection last updated in 1995 by the Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project at an unknown scale. The CA_GAP_VEG98 data set is much more spatially detailed, has more attribute information, and has detailed metadata. Original data set was called “calveg_star.e00.gz.” Data set abstract: Source for general vegetation information. Used for general vegetation information in: Poff, Roger J. 1996. Effects of Silvicultural Practices and Wildfire on Productivity of Forest Soils. In Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project: Final Report to Congress, vol. II, chap. 16. Davis: University of California, Centers for Water and Wildland Resources. (METADATA1)

SPI_CUT_PLAN

Past timber harvest plans (THPs) for Sierra Pacific Industries land in the northern portion of the study area last updated on March 15, 2004. Original data set was obtained from Jerry Bloom at "Jerry Bloom" <luddite_2@sbcglobal.net>, or (530) 273-2080, or (530) 265-9544. The attribute values for this data set include harvest name, harvest type, and harvest equipment used and the data should be useable. There is metadata for this data set. (METADATA1)

TNF_VEG_2000

Existing vegetation for the Tahoe National Forest last updated in June 2000 by the Tahoe National Forest at a scale of 1:24,000. Data set attributes include USFS strata numbers for 2000 and 1980, California WHR numbers for 2000, forest type, size class, density class, and seral stage. The original data set was obtained from John Babin, Forest GIS Coordinator, Nevada City, CA, (530) 478-6218 and was called VEG_OWN00. Data set abstract: This layer consists of the Timber Typing done for the Tahoe N.F. It shows forested, non-forested and non-vegetated polygons as interpreted from aerial photography. It is commonly acknowledged that the Tahoe's 1977 timber typing is one of the most reliable for predicting timber types in the Region. Years of field use of this layer has proven it to be "extremely" reliable in predicting vegetation for all of it's attributes (tree species, size, stocking). (METADATA1)

WIESLANDERVEG

Vegetation digitized from the "1945 Wieslander California Vegetation Type" map by the US Bureau of Reclamation at a scale of 1:1,000,000. Could potentially be used for vegetation change detection study. (METADATA1) (METADATA2)

BACK TO THE FULL METADATA INDEX

Document Actions
powered by Plone | site by ONE/Northwest and served with clean energy