Setting priorities for private land conservation in fire-prone landscapes: Are fire risk reduction and biodiversity conservation competing or compatible objectives?

Although wildfire plays an important role in maintaining biodiversity in many ecosystems, fire management to protect human assets is often carried out by different agencies than those tasked for conserving biodiversity. In fact, fire risk reduction and biodiversity conservation are often viewed as competing objectives. Here we explored the role of  management through private land conservation and asked whether we could identify private land acquisition strategies that fulfill the mutual objectives of  biodiversity conservation and fire risk reduction, or whether the maximization of  one objective comes at a detriment to the other. Using a fixed budget and number of  homes slated for development, we simulated 20 years of  housing growth under alternative conservation selection strategies, and then projected the mean risk of  fires destroying structures and the area and configuration of  important habitat types in San Diego County, California, USA. We found clear differences in both fire risk projections and biodiversity impacts based on the way conservation lands are prioritized for selection, but these differences were split between two distinct groupings. If  no conservation lands were purchased, or if  purchases were prioritized based on cost or likelihood of  development, both the projected fire risk and biodiversity impacts were much higher than if  conservation lands were purchased in areas with high fire hazard or high species richness. Thus, conserving land focused on either of  the two objectives resulted in nearly equivalent mutual benefits for both. These benefits not only resulted from preventing development in sensitive areas, but they were also due to the different housing patterns and arrangements that occurred as development was displaced from those areas. Although biodiversity conflicts may still arise using other fire management strategies, this study shows that mutual objectives can be attained through land-use planning in this region. These results likely generalize to any place where high species richness overlaps with hazardous wildland vegetation.